Comfort Zone

I managed to get to the Little early enough to get a ticket to see Comfort Zone before it sold out — its solitary screening (for now). It centers around how climate change will affect Rochester. It was made by local filmmakers Dave Danesh, Sean Donnelly, and Kate Kressmann-Kehoe: all are concerned, but each have different perspectives, and their on-camera discussions help us understand where they are coming from.

I thought the film was brutally honest and pulled no punches. I presume the filmmakers used reliable sources — after all it's only pseudo scientists who refute climate change altogether, and only a tiny percentage of legitimate climatologists don't believe it is caused by human CO2 production. In other words, it's peer-reviewed, proven theory that the excessive carbon dioxide produced from the burning of fossil fuels is causing a dramatic change in climate.

The climate of upstate New York will change over the next 50 years to be more like what it is today somewhere between South Carolina and Alabama, depending on how well we change out habits as a species. And that's only if a cataclysmic tipping point is not tripped — one that, say, changes the oceans so they no longer absorb as much CO2, or if the melting permafrost releases it's sequestered methane and, well, snowballs the whole greenhouse effect totally out of control. But assuming we don't have a cataclysmic disaster on our hands, we can expect changes in this area.

For instance, elm trees well all likely die since freezing temperatures over winter help them fight certain kinds of diseases — once hard freezes over winter are gone, so go the elm. Likewise, apples won't produce nearly a much fruit and lilacs will flower less. Numerous plant and animal species will disappear or go extinct entirely. Things are changing; they always change, but this is a lot.

The film, in a way, projects a bleak view of what's to come. But the focus is really on what can be done now to make things less worse, and given the predicted climate change, what is to come and how we should adapt.

Unbastardization of the Apostrophe

This may seem like a dumb thing to a lot of people, but it's something that has been bugging me for a long time. Not bugging me very much, but it keeps popping up.

WordPress has this feature where it makes text look nice with an internal function called wptexturize(). One of the functions buried inside it is to translate plain quotes to smart quotes — ideally it's supposed to make "this" render like 'this” and "it's" render like "it's".

But it's kind of dumb. I frequently trick it because I want to emphasize the name of an artist in the midst of a possessive with the name of the work. So I put in "Jason Olshefsky's" which renders "Jason Olshefsky‘s" and I end up fixating on that friggin' backward apostrophe. (It's clear to me the problem is wptexturize() doesn't take into account HTML tagging in the middle of a word.)

So this guy Scott Reilly wrote a nice little plug-in (overzealously) called wpuntexturize. Despite its name, it just removes the quote-mangling functionality from wptexturize(). And voila. The whole site now has plain old straight quotes and apostrophes.