# Is Electric Heat Cost-Effective?

So I did the cost-of-gas analysis last week and now I got to wondering if the cost of natural gas was high enough to justify electric heat. I first heard about this from someone who was building a workshop. They were trying to figure out if they should bother to install a gas furnace or if electric heat would be cost-effective — so I got the bug in my head about the conversion between the heat energy in natural gas and that in electricity.

So here's the deal: like last week, we have the cost of gas heat (Cg) and the cost of electric heat (Ce) which, at the break-even point will be the same:

Cg = Ce

And what we want to end up with is a break-even point where the price of a unit of natural gas (Pg) is some constant multiplied by the price of a unit of electrical energy (Pe). This is where it gets a little funny because I'm just going to assume the efficiency of a gas furnace is 80% and that an electric heater is 95%. In other words, the total heat in a cubic-foot of natural gas has a certain amount of chemical energy that can be converted to heat, but a furnace is not perfectly efficient at recovering that heat as usable heat in your house (i.e. some necessarily needs to go up the chimney to get rid of the carbon dioxide). Electric heaters are much more efficient as the easiest thing you can do with electric current is to turn it into heat — it's more like 100% efficient, but I'll assume there's some cable losses in the house and maybe it has a fan that does non-heating work.

It also gets a little funny because when I talk about the total cost of heating, for purposes of determining the conversion factor between prices-per-unit, it doesn't matter how much heat — just that it's the same amount. So let's say it's 2000 Calories — like kilocalories or the Calories in terms of food. Trust me. It'll be a fun result.

So now what we've got is that the cost is the unit price * 2000 Calories:

2000 Calories * Pg = 2000 Calories * Pe

Obviously the 2000 Calorie factor cancels out — but I'll leave it there for a while.

Now let's turn to the electricity. We pay for electricity in kilowatt-hour blocks. If I go to Google, I see that 2000 Calories is 2.324 kilowatt-hours. If I factor in that 95% efficiency, I'll need 2.447 kilowatt-hours to make 2000 Calories of heat.

Now gas gets kind of weird [great, more weird, right?] because it's delivered in hundreds of cubic feet (ccf) but billed as therms (100,000 British Thermal Units or 100,000 BTUs). RG&E does the conversion on the bill: 1.0136 therm is 1 ccf. Again turning to Google, 2000 Calories is 0.0793 therms. If I factor in that 80% efficiency, I'll need 0.0991 therms to make 2000 Calories of heat.

So now what I have is:

0.0991 therms * Pg = 2.447 kilowatt-hours * Pe

And since Pg is in dollars/therm and Pe is in dollars/kilowatt-hour, it all works out to dollars-equals-dollars which is perfect.

Moving stuff around, that's:

Pg = 2.447 kilowatt-hours * Pe / 0.0991 therms
Pg = 24.69 kilowatt-hours/therm * Pe

In other words, if you take the price-per-kilowatt of electricity, and multiply it by 24.69, you get the price-per-therm of gas for the same amount of heat.

I had signed up for ConEdison Solutions GreenPower (which is all renewable wind and hydroelectric) so there's separate sections for how much electricity costs. On the last bill I used 363 kwh and paid ConEdison \$36.12 and RG&E another \$20.93 (-\$19.38 in fixed charges for the privilege of being a customer), so that's a total of \$37.67 in charges based on a per-kwh rate. Dividing the total by 363, I get an overall cost of \$0.104/kwh.

Doing the conversion, if my gas cost is higher than 24.69 * \$0.104 = \$2.57/therm, then it's cheaper to run electric heat.

I used 157.1 therms of gas, but 3 therms are included for "free" in my \$14.38 customer charge and \$0.62 "bill issuance charge" — \$15.00 total. I paid \$209.20 for gas with all the surcharges and such, so removing the \$15.00 fixed charge, that's \$194.20. Dividing by the 154.1 therms used, that's \$1.26/therm — just about half the cost of heating with electricity.

But hey, now you can do the math yourself with your own bill. If it's easier, you can round up the conversion to 25 — so the break-even point is when the cost of a therm of gas is 25 times the cost of a kilowatt-hour of electricity.

Oh yeah, but what about the fun with the 2000 Calorie number? That's about a day's worth of food, right? So if I ran on electricity, it would cost 2.447 kilowatt-hours * \$0.104/kwh = \$0.25, or if I ran on natural gas, that would be 0.0991 therms * \$1.26/therm = \$0.12.

6,152 total views, 11 views today

## 4 thoughts on “Is Electric Heat Cost-Effective?”

1. john on said:

Great article! Glad someone had the patience to work it all out for us.

2. prem on said:

I'm not quite following you – 1 KWH = 3400BTU at 100% 1 Therm Gas = 95000BTU at 95% so 27.94 KWH energy per therm delivered…

A cool figure is 1 watt costs \$1/year at about 11.3cents / KWH – in order to dispalce 1 watt 24/7 with PV costing \$10/peak watt with 1.5 KWH generated per peak watt per year [partly sunny partly night!] – capital cost of PV to displace one watt with PV panel is ((365.25 x 1 x 24)/1500) x \$10 = \$58.44 which is a good argument for conserving every watt drain!

3. Re: "I'm not quite following you – 1 KWH = 3400BTU at 100% 1 Therm Gas = 95000BTU at 95% so 27.94 KWH energy per therm delivered…"

Basically, yeah: 1 Therm of gas can give you about the same amount of usable heat as 25 KWH of electricity. I used 95% efficiency for heat and 80% efficiency for gas which accounts for the difference (along with using 3,412 BTU per KWH per Google): (100000 BTU * 0.80) / (3412 BTU * 0.95) BTU = 24.7, the number I got.

As for solar, that's what I get intuitively, but almost \$60/watt puts it in perspective. Of course, once you get down to needing an average draw of <100 watts or so, then even grid electricity becomes absurdly cheap … or, rather than solar panels, use a couple generators hooked to exercise bikes.

4. prem on said:

OK got it – 80% & 95% –

A mystery – why are refrigertors so inefficient? I have an 80 year old classic 6 cuFt box that draws on average 12KWH per month – about one half that any of the 1000 listed energy star units use… The compressor is huge and it's manual defrost…

I looked at the formula for energy star and it's something like 248 + (K x CuFt) – per year KWH… so 0 CuFt box still draws 248KWH!?

I managed to get my monthly consumption down to <60KWH for 2 months – one person power is about 75w [400watt pulses not for long] – about 54KWH with bike going 24/7…. Interestingly 1 sqFt sunshine is about one person power and 1 KWH is about what a muscular laborer can put out in a long day… as well as 1000 pounds can be lifted by 1 KWH to a height of 1/2 mile – I think our issue in part is to get people in touch with how much power they use in some personal physical terms – Sysiphus was not a happy dude as he couldn't plug into a pile of coal to move that rock up the hill :-)

There's another thing to consider as we get into electric autos [I'm a bicyclist but think electrics would be a step in the right direction] – the cost of energy containers i.e. batteries – over life cycle the cost of storing energy in good Li cells is about \$1/KWH! – That's aside from the cost of the energy used to charge the battery… I hope we find some cheaper technologies for storage – paying \$30 for a one use gas can wouldn't be accptable but is similar to battery cost/energy content…

These aren't hard numbers just provocative ones… We need some lighter weight autos and more use of the original hybrid – the diesel electric locomotive drawn trains!

Less power to us! ride on! prem